Let’s suppose that a compliance system is $12,000 per annum. Does that sound expensive?
It’s all about what you are replacing.
If automation eliminates hundreds of hours of repetitive evidence collection across a complicated technology system, $12,000 might be a wise investment. If a seven person startup could gather the same proof in only a few hours each month, the result will be different.
It’s a great way to approach the search for a Vanta alternative. Don’t start by asking which platform offers the most features. Ask your business how these features will help you save time and money.
The Break-Even point for automation
Automating compliance isn’t inherently good or bad. The value of it changes as you grow. Imagine an expanding technology company that has multiple cloud environments and multiple applications. The task of collecting evidence constantly could be extremely high. Integrations that monitor systems automatically and record evidence easily justify the cost.
Take a look at a startup that has 10 employees preparing for their first SOC 2. Imagine a startup with 10 employees who are preparing for their first SOC 2.
It is important to know the difference when you are evaluating Vanta pricing. A sophisticated platform can provide large capabilities, but those capabilities deliver financial value only when the company actually needs the capabilities.
Compare Architecture, not Just Brands
A search for Vanta vs Drata can quickly become a feature-by-feature exercise. It is essential to look at the features, services and contracts offered by both platforms. Both are established systems for compliance that are focused on integrations and automation.
There’s another decision to make prior to that. Do you have a company that is interested in an integrated platform that can help you achieve compliance? Some companies want constant monitoring as well as automated evidence collection. Others prefer to present evidence on their own, especially if the volume of work is low.
Vanta Competitors Do Not All Use the same model
A lot of Vanta competitors are also in the same class that emphasizes automation. The market also includes lightweight platforms that are designed to focus on organization rather than extensive system connectivity.
CertAssist is part of the latter category. Created by compliance experts and internal auditors, CertAssist organizes framework controls in a central workspace, allows for the editing of policies and evidence guidance, and permits auditors to look over evidence by gaining the use of read-only access.
It is deliberately not connected to operational systems or create infrastructure agents. Customers upload and choose the documents they would like to share.
It is important to consider the access to the system.
Removing integrations has an obvious disadvantage: someone must collect evidence by hand.
This also means that integration setup is eliminated and means the compliance application does not require constant connections to the company’s operational environment.
The architectures of either are not superior to the other. It is important to ask which tradeoffs make sense for your particular business.
CertAssist is targeted towards teams that comprise between five and 200 people and gives pricing information, instead of having an actual sales call. The advertised price of launch for CertAssist is $225 monthly rather than the usual $375.
Let Complexity Have Its Place
What is required of a startup with 10 employees are not necessarily identical to those of an organization with 100 or 500 employees.
It is possible to maintain compliance with a the use of a simple platform. As employees, systems, frameworks, and requirements for evidence increase, the financials could ultimately favor more automation. This is a much better approach to buy compliance software and let complexity take its place.
Don’t buy fifty different integrations simply because they appear impressive on the chart of comparison. They should be paid for only if you realize that the cost of the task manually is greater.
